Skip to main content

CRM is Dead! Yeah, right - and Earth is a Disk

A few days ago I came across a blog entry by @MikeBoysen titled Customers Don”t Want Relationships…PERIOD!

A really intriguing title and read – perhaps written to stir up a discussion. Works for me, as it stirs me up from of my absence from this blog of mine…

Mike, after this very strong claim the starts with another one: CRM is dead.

Well, CRM seems to be pretty alive for a dead one; as a strategy and also as a technology. And here is exactly the point where Mike and other influencers – I had discussions about this topic e.g. with @bob_thompson from CustomerThink as well – are dead wrong (I couldn’t resist this pun). Their argumentation is solely based upon CRM being a technology. And then they compare CRM with another acronym that they claim is a strategy, concluding that the other one is far better. Apples vs. pears. Technology vs strategy.

CRM is not a technology. It is also not a process area.

CRM is a strategy.

CEM is another, related, strategy.

Buying a technology without a strategy to implement is bound to fail. It is like entering a road without a destination in mind. This holds true for whatever acronym is used, including CRM, SCRM, or CEM, but also “Loyalty Management”, or “Social Media”, or “Big Data”. What do I need “Big Data” for? Or what is the purpose of doing “Social Media” in an enterprise context? Are customers loyal to a vendor or does a vendor simply manage to create the impression that he is better able to deliver to customers’ needs than other vendors?

“Big Data” mitigates our inability to know about what and how to collect and analyze data beforehand and thus enables us to decide faster and better based upon data. It is nothing without a strong ability to analyze data in order to prove or disprove hypotheses, to find the needle in the haystack. “Social Media” is a way of using more and other communication channels to interact with prospects and customers. And yes, it overlaps with “Big Data”. It also overlaps with “CRM” and “CEM”, and “Loyalty Management”.
“Loyalty Management” is a strategy to bind customers to a vendor. It will not work without delivery on promise and thus not without supporting CRM and CEM strategies. I would even go as far as saying that implementing a CRM strategy involves customer experience management, CEM.

The reasons for pursuing these (and other) strategies and implementing the corresponding processes and technologies should be the same (and I deliberately do not say “IS”): Increase the measurable success of the enterprise according to its key performance indicators by implementing a strategy using one or more technologies.

And, by the way: All these strategies are targeted towards customers getting involved into a relationship, whether they want a relationship or not; customers also might not perceive it as a relationship.

What is a relationship? There are at least two useful definitions that one retrieves googling “define:relationship”:

  • “The way in which two or more people or things are connected, or the state of being connected”
  • “The way in which two or more people or groups regard and behave towards each other”

Can we measure this? I think, yes; starting with simple behavioural metrics like RFM, (email-) subscriptions, opening rates, forwarding rates, campaign reactions – it tells a lot if a customer only buys the deals - but also using surveys, customer satisfaction scores including the not-so-liked net promoter score. Add into the mix the participation in forums and statements on social media, like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and the willingness to give away personal data (in return for better targeted offers or better prices, or…?) and the ever-increasing ability to perform sentiment analysis on what we are saying and writing.
This, together with a customer-oriented approach of delivering solutions to needs, and adapting over time, helps customers and thus the business.

Having said this CRM is by no means the only customer oriented strategy that businesses need to look at. The best solutions are of no or low value if the experience is not right – maybe a bad example here, but think of the perception that SAP is still struggling with.
tl;dr CRM is a strategy and is far from dead; customer relationships are measurable and whether we as customers like it or not, we are in a relationship with vendors. Vendors, on the other hand, cannot rely on systems as a panacea: They need to implement a set of customer oriented strategies including relationship management and experience management in order to be able to repeatedly help customers getting their job done (provide a solution to their problem).


Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

SAP CRM for S/4HANA - News from the Customer Frontier

It has been a little more than half a year now that I didn’t update on what is going on with SAP CRM and S/4HANA (which I will refer to as S/4 from now on; SAP it is time for you to change the unwieldy name to something more manageable). What Happened – So FarAs you are well aware SAP is working on integrating a simplified version of SAP CRM into S4. The original roadmap offered a first customer release of an integrated product in early 2018, based on the September 2017 release of S4. The integration was planned as an add-on to S4. The initial scope of this CRM add on for S/4 was supposed to cover what is referred to as ‘core service’ functionality. This initial release shall be followed by ‘core sales’ functionality later in 2018. 2019 then is supposed to be dedicated to another round-off release covering further sales and service functionality, including loyalty management and migration tools. Roadmap and statements also so far have been fairly fuzzy about the strategic distinction b…

Clari - Nipping at Salesforce's Heels?

Nimble Mobile CRM 3.0 - A Quantum Leap?

SAP CRM into S/4HANA - Did SAP Hit Bulls Eye?

After having talked with Volker Hildebrand about the future of SAP CRM and whether or not there will be a CRM component in S/4HANA at CRM evolution 2017 I now had the chance to follow up with some folks back at SAP in Walldorf. A little RecapVolker told me that, unsurprisingly, SAP is working actively on adding CRM functionality into S/4HANA. In fact, they are merging SAP CRM into it. This is in my eyes meanwhile also the preferred of the two possible options; the other one would be marrying SAP Hybris C4C into S/4HANA. This is the approach which I originally preferred as it would lead to a cleaner code base. I changed my mind, putting customer friendliness reasons over technological cleanliness. The main advantages of merging SAP CRM into S4/HANA over SAP Hybris C4C are that this approach a)Opens a future roadmap for current SAP CRM customers that stretches beyond 2025. These customers else are at risk of defecting. b)Provides the continued chance for customers to run their SAP instance…

CPQ delivered in Customer Experience fashion