Gartner MQ BI and Analytics Platforms - Comparison 2016 to 2017 |
Last week Gartner published the updated
version of its Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics
Platforms, and I need to say that there has been a lot of movement in both
directions, up as well as down. There has been a lot of reshuffling especially
in the Visionaries quadrant.
This can partly be attributed to a changing
market that caused Gartner to combine a few of last year’s assessment criteria
as well as adding two more critical criteria as below:
Critical Capabilities Dropped or Changed:
· Combined BI Platform Administration with Security and User
Administration
· Modified Data Source Connectivity to Data Source Connectivity
and Ingestion
· Combined Publish Analytics Content and Collaboration and Social
BI to Publish, Share and Collaborate on Analytic Content
· Added Visual Appeal to Ease of Use
Capabilities Added:
· Smart Data Discovery
· Platform Capabilities Workflow Integration
Smart Data Discovery emphasizes the
increasing importance of AI and machine learning as part of analytics systems. Gartner
defines it around the automatically “finding, visualizing and narrating of
important findings such as correlations, exceptions, clusters, links and
predictions in data that are relevant to users without requiring them to build
models or write algorithms. Users explore data via visualizations,
natural-language-generated narration, search and natural-language query
technologies”.
Workflow Integration acknowledges that
there is no actionable insight if there is a standalone analytics system. It is
defined around the number of products “needed to deliver the critical
capabilities and the degree of seamless integration and workflow between
capabilities/components”. This has been true for a long time, but hey, better
late than never.
Gartner itself states that the changes have
been major and that therefor one should not do a year-over-year comparison.
Still I will venture into this territory, suspecting that the two additions
favor bigger vendors.
Notable changes to last year’s quadrant include
·
A drastic advancement of
Microsoft and Tableau making them, especially Microsoft, the undisputed leaders
of the pack
·
Salesforce and Sisense jumped
big time from the Niche Players into the Visionaries quadrant
·
Clearstory Data moved up in
terms of Completeness of Vision while TIBCO Software and IBM moved up on the
Ability to Execute axis
·
Alteryx, Pentaho and Logi
Analytics dropped off the Visionaries quadrant and became Niche Players
·
With Zoomdata we see a new
player in the Visionaries Quadrant
·
We are welcoming Oracle back in
the Quadrant as a Niche Player
There has been a little movement up or down
for SAP (slightly up on either axis), SAS (slightly up on vision but down on
execution), Qlik (slightly down on vision, marginally down on execution)
In a bit more detail, focusing on movements
in the leaders and Visionaries quadrant.
Microsoft
Microsoft offers a clear and visionary
roadmap, underpinned by monthly delivery to it, on an already very strong
product that is powered by Azure. For on premise usage there is the Power BI Desktop
solution. However, the strong focus on cloud (which I think is right) along
with still some lacking functionality hampers the execution score. This is
something that a development powerhouse like Microsoft should be able to
address. Consequent execution on their roadmap along with a continued price war
should make them a formidable competitor for Tableau, which Microsoft is likely
to surpass in the coming year.
Tableau
Tableau is in some sense the gold standard
of analytics. The software is very interactive and intuitive and got enriched
by lots of Enterprise functionality, likely in an attempt to fend off
Microsoft. As a caution Gartner mentions that these new functionalities appear
to be work in progress. Tableau appears to be in a challenging position with
the need of redefining their differentiators (interactivity and inductivity are
degrading as differentiators) and the parallel need to invest into more
up-and-coming functionalities like smart data discovery. Compared to Microsoft
Tableau is also expensive. This year will show how Tableau manages this tight
spot.
Qlik
Qlik has a sound and robust set of product
but seems to have a challenge supporting them all. The company being taken
private customers seem to have a bit of concern regarding the stability of the
roadmap, which so far seems to be unjustified. The main issue that Gartner sees
with Qlik is a lacking investment into smart data discovery, thus the downgrade
in vision.
Salesforce
Salesforce jumped far into the Visionaries
quadrant because of the combination of AI enabled analytics (Einstein),
interactive visualizations (Wave) and the purchase of smart data discovery
startup BeyondCore (which consequently vanished from the quadrant). Salesforce
seems to concentrate on their installed base when marketing and selling their
Analytics Cloud. Deeper integration of above mentioned functionalities in
combination with increased marketing and sales to new customers could move
Salesforce into the Leaders quadrant.
Clearstory Data
Clearstory Data has been in the Visionary
quadrant last year and moved strongly on the vision scale this year. This is
largely due to a strong understanding of their market, ease of use, the ability
to do complex analytics and a roadmap that focuses on the right things (smart data
discovery). Clearstory will need to work on their being fairly unknown in order
to enjoy continued success.
IBM
IBM got propelled up on the execution scale
by the strong market presence of Watson that delivers on AI driven, machine
learning, analytics capabilities and smart data discovery – ticking all the
boxes. IBM’s ‘problem’ is that they also have Cognos Analytics, which somewhat
jumbles the vision. Further, IBM surprisingly seems to have a challenge with
higher data volumes.
Sisense
Sisense moved up from the Niche Players
into the Visionaries due to a strong focus on smart data discovery and
embracing innovative technologies like voice query and offering ‘analytics
bots’. Being a young company they lack some advanced capabilities. They also
cannot yet show big deployments.
TIBCO Software
TIBCO Software renewed their focus on
critical parts of analytics software, notably smart data discovery, albeit they
are not yet ‘cloud’ enough. The renewed focus along with more emphasis on
customer engagement helped them up on the execution scale.
Zoomdata
Zoomdata debuts in this quadrant based upon
their strong focus on stream analytics. They are strong in these areas, embed
well but lack functionality and customer engagement (and customers). They also
still need to prove their ability to support big numbers of users.
But wait, that cannot be all!
What about other powerhouses like SAS, SAP,
and Oracle?
Well, Oracle is back on the map after
refreshing their analytics offering. Oracle has gained traction and with a
roadmap that includes machine learning, smart data discovery and NLP stands a
chance of moving up to the Visionaries quadrant next year.
SAP is virtually unmoved, slightly up on
both scales probably. The analytics offering seems to have good momentum and the
roadmap is geared into the right direction. The company’s main challenge
continues to be support and the complexity of SAP product, both being actively
targeted.
This leaves us with SAS. While SAS has one
of the strongest functional footprints and strong integration. Similar to SAP,
SAS hurts itself in cost, ease of use and ease of making business with. On top
of this there seems to be confusion about the different product lines SAS
offers. As with SAP none of these challenges should be insurmountable.
Comments
Post a Comment