A few weeks ago I wrote an article about customer
service in a world of ambient computing. This article looked at customer
service from a customer’s point of view. In it I described how I see customer
service getting humanised again by leveraging the advances in AI technologies
like Natural Language Processing, speech-to-text- and text-to-speech generation
along with intent determination.
Leveraging these technologies customer
service will turn into a conversation and it won’t matter anymore whether
service is delivered by a bot or by a human.
For the customer it will all appear to be
the same. Instead of FAQs or web searches, bots will be the first line of
support and escalate a problem to humans if they cannot solve it on their own.
The obvious question is whether there will
be an impact on the customer service center?
And it probably does.
Call centers, and with it the service
agents as well as their managers, already now are under intense pressure to
deliver, and to deliver more efficiently.
With the increasing use of call deflection
technologies like FAQs and communities there is a trend for the incidents
facing the agents becoming more challenging. For example Helpshift states that already with its
technology it is able to deflect
about 90% of all incidents, which are solved via the native in-app FAQ that
is delivered by the them. This statement basically says that the support staff
is basically relieved of dealing with simple matters but has the chance to take
up the more challenging ones. Still, in a world of ambient computing any given
app can have hundreds of millions of users.
Let’s say that any given day just one per
cent of 100 million users have an issue. The well working FAQ deflects 99% of
these. That leaves the service center with 100,000 calls.
In one day.
And they are the harder ones.
Still, let’s be optimistic and say that an
agent can solve 10 issues an hour, giving him 80 in an 8 hour shift. This would
mean an overall call center size of 1,250 agents is needed to cope with this
demand.
Each of them under a tremendous stress level.
With the systems behind bots becoming more
and more intelligent the difficulty of raised issues will increase, even if
FAQs and web searches are essentially hidden behind a bot interface that
essentially makes the human agent the second point of contact again as opposed
to the third, which likely means that the customer’s level of annoyance is
slightly less elevated than in a third level scenario.
At the same time it seems that call center
agents are not prepared for handling this stress level. The employee turnover
rate remains high and is probably even rising.
What Does This Mean For The Service Center?
Call centers are therefore facing a double
challenge
1.
Contain cost. This is achieved
by more automation, which in turn puts more strain on the employees
2.
Employ and retain a highly
skilled set of service agents, which additionally have matching character
traits, which drives cost. Skilled people tend to be more expensive than
unskilled ones, and moving a call center into a low-salary country helps only
so much – if at all. Training comes at an expense as well. This will be
somewhat augmented by reduced hiring cost
The solution to it will be multi-faceted
and increase a trend that is already visible.
Implement intelligent systems that more
than offset the higher salaries demanded – and deserved – by the fewer call
center agents, through an increased solution rate and through them being of
more help to the service agents. These systems will significantly rely on
machine learning out of a variety of sources
Employ communities by incentivizing to
other users to help other users. These communities will be managed by community
managers, with increasing support by AI-driven bots.
Highly data driven prioritization and
intelligent grouping and routing of incidents to the best matching agent, bot
or human. This will involve sophisticated Natural Language Processing
capabilities but will help in solving multiple calls regarding the same problem
in one process
Improved collaboration, bot – bot, bot –
human, human – bot, human – human, to further increase the service center’s
efficiency. Bot to bot collaboration and bot to human collaboration are for
smooth handovers, as for the foreseeable future bots will stay focused on
narrowly defined scopes. Human to human collaboration is again a smooth
handover to the right expert, but is also about educating the colleague by
helping out with own specialized experience. Finally, human to bot
collaboration is about the human training the system on the go.
Last, but not least, by hiring the right
people. An early 2017 study by Harvard Business Review on Kick-Ass Customer
Service revealed that call center managers are hiring the wrong people. In
scenarios that increasingly deflect calls it needs more highly trained
controllers and rocks with a mindset for collaboration, rather than
empathizers. While empathy is important what matters most when dealing with a
customer in an aggravated mood is a fast and efficient resolution. With this,
the role of the manager will change, too, into the direction of being a servant
to the team and taking care of roadblocks for the agents and fostering
collaboration.
This collaboration mandatorily extends into
the product department. The best issue is the one that doesn’t even occur. Data
from the call center, and from the app itself, gives unique insight into
possible problem patterns. And the best problem to have is the one that doesn’t
even occur. DevOps gives an idea on how this can get achieved.
Ah yes, don’t script too much. Scripts are
a good guidance for someone unknowledgeable, which the future call center agent
is not.
The future of the call center lies in a
high degree of automation, powered by highly skilled and motivated agents. That
brings the human back to customers and agents alike.
Comments
Post a Comment