Skip to main content

What the heck is Customer Centricity?


Customer Centricity
Reading the very interesting post Customer Centricity is MORE than Customer Experience by Joseph Michelli I engaged into a discussion about things centricity. The discussion basically is about answering the question “What the heck is customer centricity?” – this elusive thing.
And how does it relate to customer experience and other ‘centricities’, like price centricity, product centricity, or service centricity?
When do we call a company customer centric?
Of course there are some usual suspects that can be used as examples to make one point or another.
Is Ryanair customer centric? Aldi? Amazon? Apple? Google? Starbucks? Jiro’s sushi restaurant?
Luckily all participating disputants have a different view, so there is a vivid discussion going on, from which one can learn a LOT.
But first things first. Let’s get the issue of customer centricity vs. customer experience out of the way. Joseph states, that “customer centricity is a commitment or a strategy to assure the success of your customer. Whereas, customer experience is a set of customer perceptions forged across all their interactions with your brand.” (emphasis by Joseph Michelli). In brief: customer centricity is a strategy and customer experience is an outcome.
This distinction is important, as not only a customer centric strategy leads to customer experiences (plural, every interaction with your brand results in an experience), which accumulate to customer experience (singular, the weighted sum total of all customer experiences over time).
So, let’s assume there are four possible pure strategies: customer centric, price centric, product centric, service centric, and put a stake into the ground by briefly defining them.
I call a strategy service centric if all decisions that a company takes revolve around providing best possible service in the market.
It is product centric if all decisions revolve around having the best possible product in the market.
A price centric strategy tries to establish the best possible (typically lowest) price in the market. For the sake of the discussion here I treat a price centric strategy as the same as a process centric strategy, as lowest price comes only with optimally streamlined processes.
Finally, a customer centric strategy is one that establishes the best possible outcome for the customer.
Of course all and any of these strategies are to be seen in a business context, most notably in the need of staying profitable.
And mostly they turn up in a combination. There rarely are pureplay strategies, with the possible exception of the price strategy. Ryanair, or Aldi can serve as examples. I am sure there are more.
Where the first three are very different from the last one is that they have an inside-out focus whereas the customer centric strategy has an outside-in focus. It first looks at the customers and their needs and then evolves its product, price, even the organization around best fulfillment of these needs, or providing best value to the customer – again, within the limits of staying profitable.
But, all of them lead to customer experiences and consequently to customer experience. Just that they are very different.
Experiences have some relation to expectations. If you expect a no-frills experience and receive exactly that, you are more prone to be satisfied. If you expect something gold-plated and receive copper, you are not. If you expect something gold-plated you are also more likely to go to further lengths to receive it. These lengths may actually become part of the (positive) experience, as they suggest exclusivity.
This is, where the simplified Maslov pyramid of expectations comes into play that I described in earlier posts, e.g. here.
Price pure-plays will be able to fulfill the base expectations; there is no frill, no real ease for the customer and surely no wow.
Product and service strategies, especially the latter, have the potential of adding ease to the mix. The value for the customer increases, and so does the experience (if done right). Customer centric strategies then also offer the possibility of a wow – the possibility, not the promise.
In order to achieve this, customer centricity needs to encompass elements of all the other strategies. All aspects of the customer life cycle need to be looked at out of the customer’s eyes and the organization needs to be built around what the customer sees. Or else it will be impossible to put the customer at the center.
I’d argue that only customer centric strategies result in truly loyal customers. The other strategies in captive ones.
Am I right? What do you think?


Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

SAP CRM and SAP Jam - News from CRM evolution

During CRM Evolution 2017 I had the chance of talking with Volker Hildebrand and Anthony Leaper from SAP. Volker is SAP’s Global Vice President SAP Hybris and Anthony is Senior Vice President and Sales GM - Enterprise Social Software at SAP. Topics that we covered were things CRM and collaboration, how and where SAP’s solutions are moving and, of course, the impact that the recent reshuffling in the executive board has. Starting with the latter, there is common agreement, that if at all it is positive as likely to streamline reporting lines and hence decision processes. First things first – after all I am a CRM guy. Having the distinct impression that the SAP Hybris set of solutions is going a good way I was most interested in learning from Volker about how there is going to be a CRM for S4/HANA. SAP’s new generation ERP system is growing at a good clip, and according to the Q1/2017 earnings call, now has 5,800 customers with 400 new customers in the last quarter alone. Many...

How to play the long game Zoho style

The news On February 7 and 8 2024, Zoho held its annual ZohoDay conference, along with a pre-conference get together and an optional visit to SpacX’s not-too-far-away Starbase. Our guide, who went by Chief, and is probably best described as a SpaceX-paparazzi was full of facts and anecdotes, which made the visit very interesting although we couldn’t enter Starbase itself. The event was jam-packed with 125 analysts, 17 customer speakers, and of course Zoho staff for us analysts to talk to. This was a chance we took up eagerly. This time, the event took place in MacAllen, TX, instead of Austin, TX. The reason behind this is once more Zoho’s ruralization strategy, transnational localism.  Which gives also one of the main themes of the event. It was more about understanding Zoho than about individual products, although Zoho disclosed some roadmaps. More about understanding Zoho in a second.  The second main theme was customer success and testimonials. Instead of bombarding us with...

SaaS or the Rise of the Undead

SaaS is dead! It will be replaced by agentic systems that replace coded business logic by AI agents that autonomously interact to bring said business logic to life, just smarter. Satya Nadella said it - or at least something in these lines, if I believe all the pundits around. His words lit up the Internet. And Satya Nadella being the CEO of a 3 trillion dollar company is the ultimate fount of truth and wisdom, when it comes to business applications. Is he not? So, what should we take from his statements? After all, the words of the CEO of one of the top 3 valuable companies on this Earth carry some weight. Let me start straight.  I call BS! SaaS, first of all, is a delivery model of logic that also had some implications on vendors‘ business models and their approaches to pricing. For a variety of good and not so good reasons this delivery model succeeded vs. the prevalent model of on-premises software. Some of the more important reasons have been “no lock in by vendors”, “only pay...

Zoho - A True Unicorn

End of January Zoho held its 2020 Zoho Days, an analyst summit, which I was happy to attend, along with more than 60 colleagues, as the only analyst from Germany, as it seems. Sadly, it took me quite a while to complete this – Zoho deserves a faster commentare. But hey, let’s look forward and get rolling. Zoho is a privately owned enterprise software company that has quietly evolved from a small software company in 1996 to an ambitious global player that serves the SMB- and enterprise CRM market with cloud applications. The company has a set of 45+ business apps with more than 50 million users, 10 data centres and counting, and is available in 180 countries. The company is profitable and maintained a CAGR of more than 30 percent over the past five years. But why quietly? Because Zoho managed its growth pretty unusually (almost) fully organically with only very minor acquisitions. Crunchbase lists one. Following this unique approach, which defies the tradit...

Salesforce stock tanks after earnings report - a snap analysis

The news On May 29, 2024, Salesforce reported its results for the first quarter of the fiscal year 2025. Highlights are a total quarterly revenue of $9.133bn US, resembling a year-over-year growth of 11 percent a current remaining performance obligation of $26.4bn US a remaining performance obligation of $53.9B US an operating margin of 18.7 percent. diluted earnings per share of $1.56 The company reported a revenue guidance of $9.2bn - $9.25bn US for the next quarter and a full year guidance of $37.7bn - $38.0bn US, resembling growth rates of 7 – 8 percent and 8 – 9 percent, respectively. With these numbers, Salesforce ended up at the lower end of last quarter’s guidance on the revenue growth side while exceeding the earnings per share projection and slightly lowered the guidance for the fiscal year 2025. The result: The company’s share price dropped from $272 to bottom out at $212. The bigger picture Salesforce is the big gorilla in the CRM and CX industry. The company has surpassed ...