Skip to main content

CRM, CX and Customer Engagement - three humble wishes to better the industry

a cyberpunk style crm guy has wishes for better customer experience by Thomas Wieberneit with Dall-E
The CRM Playaz asked me about my take on CRM for 2023. Of course, I happily supplied an answer …

So, here we are. CRM in terms of concept and software is quite mature, after all it is around for quite some time. It went through some iterations and spun out into other areas, being more transactionally focused, instead of engagement focused. This led to the creation of more software categories, termed customer engagement management or, more recently, customer experience management. This had the potential to create misconceptions and ambiguities, especially when all three categories, customer relationship management, customer engagement and customer experience are looked at. There is confusion across these terms – as there are no generally accepted definitions around – and there is even confusion when looking at the terms individually.

That made me express three wishes and advice, one for customer relationship management, one for customer experience, and one for customer engagement.

TL;DR – if you do not want to read, here is the video that I created.


Let’s start with CRM

CRM stands for customer relationship management. I do not want to dive into the discussion about whether there is too much focus on the M and not enough on the R. This is certainly worth a discussion of its own. Instead, let me share the observation that, sadly, CRM is far too often used when actually SFA – sales force automation is meant. This is a limited view on CRM that has been introduced mainly by vendors that focus on enabling sales forces and that has gained far too much traction.

Customer relationship management, as a strategy, as a discipline, supported by technology, covers all aspects of marketing, sales, and service. In brief, it supports and enables all customer facing functions. It is therefore so much more than just SFA, sales force automation. This is true, even if only a sales oriented implementation is done. Limiting one’s thinking of CRM to sales force automation is a surefire approach to missing out on a lot of possibilities to improve the life of non-sales customer facing staff.

My wish is to not limit customer relationship management to SFA to enable us to be able to leverage all the possibilities that CRM offers.

Continuing with CX

CX stands for customer experience. It is also the acronym that is used to name a software category. Let us be clear: there is at most one person on the planet – in the universe – who is in charge of their own experience. Yes, the person that actually has an experience. In terms of businesses, this is the customer. The actual experience will differ with the person, with gender, cultural background, education, etc. And for any person, this experience may also very well be different day by day, it might even differ with the time of the day. There is so much context involved in this.

A software system cannot deliver an experience. There is no system of experience whatsoever. A software system can only enable an experience, by being used to engage with the customer with the intent of the customer having a desired experience.

My wish is for both, software vendors and -buyers to not talk of creating experiences but to think about how to successfully use software systems for what they are intended: customer engagement.

Which brings me to CE – customer engagement

Customer engagement is a bi-directional process. And as a company or an organization you have only one side under a semblance of control: your own side. You cannot control how the customer acts or reacts and how the customer engages with you. You as a business can only offer the ways and means, from which the customer does choose. This choice that your organization offers has an impact on how the customer experience’s the interaction with your organization, btw.

As customer engagement is bi-directional with one half of the process being out of a business’ control, businesses must not consider their own objectives as the reason for the engagement. Instead, they rather need to look at achieving their own objectives as a consequence of the customers achieving theirs. The reason for every engagement, every step in it, is fulfilling a customer need, thereby making the customer successful. A customer who consistently fulfils their needs successfully with the help of a company is a happy customer. Happy customers return.

My wish is that businesses, their managers and employees, understand their success as being a consequence of the success of their customers. Creating happy, satisfied customers is the objective, not the means to become successful oneself.

In this sense I wish everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous year 2023. 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

SAP CRM and SAP Jam - News from CRM evolution

During CRM Evolution 2017 I had the chance of talking with Volker Hildebrand and Anthony Leaper from SAP. Volker is SAP’s Global Vice President SAP Hybris and Anthony is Senior Vice President and Sales GM - Enterprise Social Software at SAP. Topics that we covered were things CRM and collaboration, how and where SAP’s solutions are moving and, of course, the impact that the recent reshuffling in the executive board has. Starting with the latter, there is common agreement, that if at all it is positive as likely to streamline reporting lines and hence decision processes. First things first – after all I am a CRM guy. Having the distinct impression that the SAP Hybris set of solutions is going a good way I was most interested in learning from Volker about how there is going to be a CRM for S4/HANA. SAP’s new generation ERP system is growing at a good clip, and according to the Q1/2017 earnings call, now has 5,800 customers with 400 new customers in the last quarter alone. Many

How to play the long game Zoho style

The news On February 7 and 8 2024, Zoho held its annual ZohoDay conference, along with a pre-conference get together and an optional visit to SpacX’s not-too-far-away Starbase. Our guide, who went by Chief, and is probably best described as a SpaceX-paparazzi was full of facts and anecdotes, which made the visit very interesting although we couldn’t enter Starbase itself. The event was jam-packed with 125 analysts, 17 customer speakers, and of course Zoho staff for us analysts to talk to. This was a chance we took up eagerly. This time, the event took place in MacAllen, TX, instead of Austin, TX. The reason behind this is once more Zoho’s ruralization strategy, transnational localism.  Which gives also one of the main themes of the event. It was more about understanding Zoho than about individual products, although Zoho disclosed some roadmaps. More about understanding Zoho in a second.  The second main theme was customer success and testimonials. Instead of bombarding us with presenta

Reflecting on 2023 with gratitude - What caught your interest

A very happy, healthy and prosperous new year to all of you. This is also the time to review my blog and to have a look what your favourite posts of 2023 have been. With 23 posts, I admittedly have been somewhat lazy in 2023. Looking at the top ten read posts in 2023, there is a clear clustering about a few topics, none of them really surprising. There is a genuine interest in CX, ChatGPT, and vendors.  Again, this is not a surprise.  Still, there are a few surprises in the list! So, without further adoo, let’s hear the drumroll for your top five favourite posts on my blog – in ascending order. After all, some suspense cannot harm. The fifth place gets claimed by my review of ZohoDay 2022 – “ Don’t mess with Zoho – A Zohoday 2022 recap ”. Yes, you read that right. This is a 2022 post. The fourth place got claimed by another article on Zoho, almost one year younger: Zoho, how a technology company reimagines business software . It is a reflection on the Zoholics 2023 conference in Austin

The Generative AI Game of Thrones - Is OpenAI toast?

The News This has been an exciting weekend for the generative AI industry. On Friday November 17, OpenAI announced that the company fired its figurehead CEO Sam Altmann and appointed Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati as interims CEO in a surprise move. The press release states that Altmann “ was not consistently candid in his communications with the board .” Surprised was apparently not only Sam Altmann, but also the till then chairman of the board Greg Brockman who first stepped down from this position and subsequently quit OpenAI. Investors, notably Microsoft, found themselves blindsided, too – or flat footed depending on the individual point of view. Satya Nadella was compelled to state that Microsoft stays committed to the partnership with OpenAI in a blog post that got updated on November 19, 11:55 pm. All hell broke loose. Microsoft shares took a significant hit. A number of additional senior OpenAI personnel quit. Both, Altman and Brockman, voiced the idea of founding anoth

Zoho - A True Unicorn

End of January Zoho held its 2020 Zoho Days, an analyst summit, which I was happy to attend, along with more than 60 colleagues, as the only analyst from Germany, as it seems. Sadly, it took me quite a while to complete this – Zoho deserves a faster commentare. But hey, let’s look forward and get rolling. Zoho is a privately owned enterprise software company that has quietly evolved from a small software company in 1996 to an ambitious global player that serves the SMB- and enterprise CRM market with cloud applications. The company has a set of 45+ business apps with more than 50 million users, 10 data centres and counting, and is available in 180 countries. The company is profitable and maintained a CAGR of more than 30 percent over the past five years. But why quietly? Because Zoho managed its growth pretty unusually (almost) fully organically with only very minor acquisitions. Crunchbase lists one. Following this unique approach, which defies the tradit