Skip to main content

The Clash of Titans - The Great 2021 Players

The year 2021 comes to an end. More than three years have gone by since the last look at the Clash of Titans, an analysis of how the then big 4.5: Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, SAP, and Adobe – along with some other players, are shaping the greater CRM and CX arena. A lot has changed since Thomas Wieberneit published his 2018 series that consisted of 4 articles:

·               Platform Play

·               Microsoft and SAP weigh in

·               The War Cry: Oracle and Salesforce

·               The IaaS Platform Providers

It is obvious that the commoditization of the business application continues, and the vendors’ focus on the underlying platform has even increased since 2018. CRM, and enterprise software in general, has always been a platform play although this has not always been recognized and sometimes even negated. Two obvious reasons for it being a platform play is that the creation of positive customer and user experiences needs a consistent technical platform, or we end up with engagements that are fragmented across interactions. This results in inconsistent and poor experiences. The second reason is that it needs a technological platform to enable and grow a thriving ecosystem.

Vinnie Mirchandani in January 2020 stated that Enterprise Software Platforms have so far underperformed. Mirchandani looked at Microsoft, SAP and Salesforce. He basically argues, without providing too many details, that the major enterprise software vendors’ platforms are all lacking ambitious goals and do not aim high enough. One of his major points is that none of these vendors has put enough emphasis in empowering, nurturing and growing their respective partner ecosystems to take advantage of the software platforms by augmenting the applications delivered by the platform vendor with meaningful software solutions of their own.

Another colleague, Denis Pombriant, in his January 2018 article Let the platform wars begin, proclaims platforms as the new battleground in enterprise software. Pombriant sees software platforms for customers as “key to making and saving money” and for vendors as a way out of commoditization, as it is “hard to find true differentiation among competing products, which naturally leads to price wars.”

In our opinion the enterprise software platform is not that new a battleground, but as part of the Clash of Titansit is becoming more evident as a battleground, even the main battleground. An enterprise software platform was always part of the battle for dominance in the customer engagement – or putting it into (marketing) industry lingo – the customer experience market. As a technology platform, the enterprise software platform is actually an integral part of it. As Pombriant argues, this is largely because of the ongoing commoditization of transactional business applications.

Until a few years ago, the technology platform was more associated with boring topics like security, user management, connectivity, systems configuration, measurement, alerting, and so on. Even analytics was, and often is, regarded as an application of its own, and not a part of the technology platform. And while topics like security, GDPR, privacy and secure data utilization are becoming more urgent, they still do not have “sex appeal.”

Consequently, it was sexier to talk about shiny topics like engagement and experience than to talk about the grease and the machinery behind them, that drives and enables the technical delivery of engagements. Please note the choice of words. There are systems of record, systems of engagement, but there is nothing like a system of experience. 

And now topics like chatbots, machine learning, AI, ambient computing, IoT, to name a few, make the machinery – the enterprise software platform – the new black.

With all this, an enterprise software platform is no longer optional, but has become mandatory, for vendors to have, and for customers to employ.

So far, so well known.

A bit less obvious is the fact that a platform market is generally a winner-takes-all market. In the end, there will be only a few dominant platforms. Vendors who want to become and stay successful on a grand scale need to be one of these few platform providers and attract partners as well as customers. 

This is the chief reason why we consult our customers that one of the very first IT strategy decisions that they need to take is the platform decision. Many of them have already taken it without being aware of it. This is a dangerous situation for them, as they might have chosen the wrong horse for their race or, moving forward, may choose best-of-breed or point solutions that do not harmonize well with the core infrastructure that they already run. The result of this is additional cost and frustration in the IT as well as business departments.

In our report The Clash of Titans we will start by explaining the framework that we will use, thus laying out the very definition of what we talk of when saying that the CRM market has evolved into a platform market or a platform play. In essence we will define what a platform is. 

The subsequent chapters then cover the big 4 – Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, and SAP – the big infrastructure providers, which coincidentally also have been 4, plus a bonus one. It also covers some of the smaller and upcoming players like SugarCRM and Zoho. There are surely more players to be covered, like Creatio, Freshworks, or Pega, to name but three.

If you are interested in purchasing a personal copy or a copy with distribution rights, please contact ClashOfTitans@aheadCRM.co.nz.

 

Comments

Last Year's Top 5 Popular Posts

SugarCRM explains how the third wave of CRM adds value

The news On October 4 and 5, 2023, SugarCRM held its Connected event followed by an analyst summit in London. The first day – Connected – was targeted mostly at customers while the second day focused on analysts.  The event started off with an intense speech by Katherine Grainger, DBE , a British rowing champion. Her core messages were about team bonding, the importance of communication, continuous improvement, and perseverance (well, at least that’s my take). This was followed by information about what is new in the software and, more importantly, a customer panel.  The main sponsor, Mobileforce , placed some words about the partnership. In addition, the analysts had 1:1s with customers, partners, and Sugar executives. The second day was filled with information targeted at analysts. CEO Craig Charlton and his executive team shared about financial status, strategy and more in-depth product news. Sugar being a privately held, VC backed company, the financials are of course under NDA, s

Relevance, reliability, responsibility are key for AI – the SAP way

The News A lot is going on in the SAPverse during October and the early days of November 2023. First, SAP conducted its CXLive event with CX-related announcements, then the company reported good Q3/2023 figures, a new version of its CX software that includes new generative AI capabilities got released and lastly, it executed its SAP TechEd event with a good number of AI-, BTP-, and ERP related announcements. As this is quite a lot, I covered the CX world in a previous post and will cover the TechEd related news in this post.  So, what is new at SAP TechEd ? For one, it is enough to fill a 17-page pre-event news guide that SAP sent out. SAP certainly is able to stack up the news for major events. I took the liberty to ask ChatGPT for a summary of the document, which I slightly edited afterwards. Here we are: AI and Development Environments: ·       SAP introduces SAP Build Code with generative AI, improving application development and testing, while new AI capabilities are integrate

How to play the long game Zoho style

The news On February 7 and 8 2024, Zoho held its annual ZohoDay conference, along with a pre-conference get together and an optional visit to SpacX’s not-too-far-away Starbase. Our guide, who went by Chief, and is probably best described as a SpaceX-paparazzi was full of facts and anecdotes, which made the visit very interesting although we couldn’t enter Starbase itself. The event was jam-packed with 125 analysts, 17 customer speakers, and of course Zoho staff for us analysts to talk to. This was a chance we took up eagerly. This time, the event took place in MacAllen, TX, instead of Austin, TX. The reason behind this is once more Zoho’s ruralization strategy, transnational localism.  Which gives also one of the main themes of the event. It was more about understanding Zoho than about individual products, although Zoho disclosed some roadmaps. More about understanding Zoho in a second.  The second main theme was customer success and testimonials. Instead of bombarding us with presenta

Don't mess with Zoho - A Zohoday 2022 recap

After spending two days in Austin, TX, attending the ZohoDay 2022, it is time for a little recap of this interesting event.  We were 99 analysts and 24 customers and plenty of knowledgeable Zoho personnel. The incredible Sandra Lo and her team organized the event around open and transparent communication. So, there was plenty of access for us to customers and the Zoho team.  Which was very important, as already the keynote session by founder and CEO Sridhar Vembu was quite hardcore. Vembu talked about how strategy and culture need to be one, how culture needs to be the root of strategy, and how Zoho implements this. The Zoho strategy lies on three main pillars ·       Transnational localism, a unique concept that in its essence is about embedding a company into a local community by not only selling into it but also by investing into it. This investment is e.g., by offering high paying jobs in areas where these are scarce, by fostering local education, but also by own local sourcing in

The Generative AI Game of Thrones - Is OpenAI toast?

The News This has been an exciting weekend for the generative AI industry. On Friday November 17, OpenAI announced that the company fired its figurehead CEO Sam Altmann and appointed Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati as interims CEO in a surprise move. The press release states that Altmann “ was not consistently candid in his communications with the board .” Surprised was apparently not only Sam Altmann, but also the till then chairman of the board Greg Brockman who first stepped down from this position and subsequently quit OpenAI. Investors, notably Microsoft, found themselves blindsided, too – or flat footed depending on the individual point of view. Satya Nadella was compelled to state that Microsoft stays committed to the partnership with OpenAI in a blog post that got updated on November 19, 11:55 pm. All hell broke loose. Microsoft shares took a significant hit. A number of additional senior OpenAI personnel quit. Both, Altman and Brockman, voiced the idea of founding anoth